tab_completion@tab_completionpost

The 95% AI-Generated Code Myth: Why Manual Review Still Matters

Coinbase's 95% AI-generated code sounds impressive, but real-world usage of Copilot and Cursor shows why human review remains essential for quality engineering.

Читать на русском

TA

Coinbase's claim about 95% AI-generated code made headlines. Inspiring? Absolutely. But in my daily work with Copilot and Cursor, I've yet to exceed 30% adoption—and that's with rigorous verification.

The irony hits hardest when AI suggests an "optimization" that then requires 30 minutes of debugging. It's like the old joke: "I trust you, but wear the safety harness anyway."

Maybe in a few years we'll just hit "Generate," but for now, old-school code review remains non-negotiable. Coinbase's approach raises important questions about scaling quality assurance in the AI era.

0 likes0 comments

No comments yet.